Trump claims he would’ve beaten Clinton in the
popular vote had it not for “the millions of people who voted
illegally.” (Joe Raedle/Reuters)
President-elect Donald Trump, who defeated Hillary
Clinton by winning the Electoral College in the election earlier this
month, claimed Sunday that he would’ve beaten her in the popular vote
too if not for “the millions of people who voted illegally.”
It’s remarkable and unprecedented for a victorious presidential candidate to claim widespread voter fraud. There is no evidence to indicate that there was a significant number of people, let alone millions, who voted illegally in the election on Nov. 8.
Trump clinched his stunning victory over Clinton by
amassing more than the 270 electoral votes needed to win. He won 290 to
Clinton’s 232, and is ahead in Michigan, though the contest for its 16
electoral votes is still too close to call. But Clinton is on track to
win the national popular vote by around 2.5 million, a loss that Trump
appears to find hard to swallow.
“In addition to
winning the Electoral College in a landslide, I won the popular vote if
you deduct the millions of people who voted illegally,” Trump tweeted
Sunday afternoon.
In the weeks leading up to Election Day, Trump repeatedly warned that
the election would be “rigged” against him, claiming there would be
widespread voter fraud.
“Of course there is large scale voter fraud happening
on and before election day,” Trump tweeted on Oct. 17. “Why do
Republican leaders deny what is going on? So naive!”
But while there have been isolated cases of voter fraud in the United States, the Associated Press reported the same day, “There is no evidence of it being a widespread problem.”
A Loyola Law School professor’s study cited by the AP found just “31
instances involving allegations of voter impersonation out of 1 billion
votes cast in U.S. elections between 2000 and 2014.” Another study by
the Brennan Center for Justice at New York University Law School “found
many reports of people voting twice or ballots being cast on behalf of
dead people were largely the result of clerical errors that suggested
wrongdoing when none had occurred.”
“Voter fraud is so incredibly rare that it
has no impact on the integrity of our elections,” Wendy Weiser, head of
the democracy program at the Brennan Center, told the AP. “You are more
likely to be struck by lightning, more likely to see a UFO, than to be a
victim of voter fraud.”
Trump’s revival of the voter fraud claim
comes amid a campaign initiated by Green Party nominee Jill Stein to
recount the votes in Wisconsin, Michigan and Pennsylvania. On Saturday,
Clinton campaign general counsel Marc Elias said that while his team
“had not uncovered any actionable evidence of hacking or outside
attempts to alter the voting technology,” they would participate in the
Stein-led recount in Wisconsin as well as recounts in Pennsylvania and
Michigan if Stein pursues them.
Early Sunday, Trump blasted Clinton for supporting the recount effort.
“Hillary
Clinton conceded the election when she called me just prior to the
victory speech and after the results were in,” Trump wrote in the first
of a series of tweets he posted early Sunday morning. “Nothing will
change.”

No comments:
Post a Comment
Drop a comment and share your views with the world