Showing posts with label Religion. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Religion. Show all posts

Monday, 24 October 2016

Miss Bumbum contestants portray Christ and his disciples Last Supper painting in their bikinis



Brazil’s Miss Bumbum beauty pageant has sparked controversy after hopefuls posed for a raunchy portrayal of iconic religious painting The Last Supper.

The photo shows eight hopefuls in the country’s popular ‘rear of the year’ contest portraying Christ and his disciplines – with the sexiest girl posing as Jesus.
Religious leaders branded the remake of the Da Vinci masterpiece “deeply disrespectful” and even Brazil’s religious intolerance commission condemned the picture.
Even one of the women involved said she regretted posing for the shot and said she had “asked forgiveness from God for a great sin”.
Daiana Fegueredo, representing the state of Ceara, was chosen to play Jesus in the photo as her bottom received the most number of phone votes, making her the frontrunner in the race for the coveted title.



But she said she now regrets agreeing to taking part:
 “I did the photo because of my contract. But I didn’t like it and I wasn’t happy about it. You can’t play around with the word of God.
I completely understand people being angry about it, because even I’m angry and I’m in it. For me it is blasphemy.”I feel really bad deep inside of me. I’m a practising Catholic. Since I did the photo my heart is tight inside my chest, I can’t sleep and I don’t stop thinking about it. I’ve already asked forgiveness from God, and I ask forgiveness from everyone else. We went too far. We were part of a great sin.”
Father Clesio Vieira, from the Volta Redonda diocese of Rio de Janeiro, said the photo has caused “great offence” to Catholics.
“Everyone’s talking about it. It has broken the boundaries of ethics and respect, all in the name of money. This isn’t creativity, it’s the vulgarisation of the sacred and is deeply disrespectful.”
Assistant bishop of Rio de Janeiro, Antonio Augusto Dias Duarte, also criticised the photos, saying he was against any images showing women’s bottoms, “whatever the setting”.
He added: “Women need to be valued for their role as a wife, mother, professional, and for her intellectual and cultural qualities.”


From Daily Mirror

Tuesday, 20 September 2016

24-year-old footballer quits the game to 'concentrate on religion'


Sheffield Wednesday player, Jeremy Helan, 24, was once dubbed 'the next Patrice Evra' but he has walked away from the game in order to 'concentrate on religion'.

The former France U-19 international who came through the ranks at Manchester City, informed stunned officials of his plans last week.


It is understood he has become disillusioned with the game and is intending to go to Saudi Arabia after reportedly spending increasing amounts of time at a mosque in the city. The player has not spoken on the situation but a source said: ‘It is the talk of the dressing room. Jeremy told them what he wanted to do last week. He said that he wanted to quit for Saudi to concentrate on religion after becoming more involved at a mosque in Sheffield. The club are a bit taken aback by it. They are working with him to come to some kind of agreement.’

Friends and associates believe he should continue with the game and are trying to change his mind.

Wednesday, 24 August 2016

Government sued for religious discrimination




 A Lagos based human rights activist Chief Malcolm Omirhobo has sued the federal government and the 36 state governments for sponsoring Christians and Moslems pilgrims on their annual pilgrimages to Jerusalem and Saudi Arabia, while not extending the same privileges to other religions.
He said that the action of government was in violation of Section 10 of the 1999 constitution which states that “the government of the federation or of a state shall not accept any religion as State Religion.
Also that the “granting of concessionary exchange rate to the Moslem and Christian pilgrims alone was preferential, double standard, discriminatory, illegal, unconstitutional and a violation of the fundamental rights to freedom of worship as enshrined in section 38 and amounts to discrimination according to section 42 of the 1999 Nigerian Constitution.
“Aside Christianity and Islam, there are Nigerians who are practicing other forms of religion such as Paganism, Buddhism, Harri Krishna, Animism, Eckanker, Grail message, Amok Atheism etc,” he said.
“When I secured a visa to visit the United States of America for vacation and approached my bank to procure my Basic Travelling Allowance (BTA) for the trip, I was informed that the exchange rate of the Naira to the Dollar was N318.00 to $1.00. So because of the very high exchange rate, I had to painfully put aside my vacation for the year.
 “Same applies to many Nigerians on daily basis who are in dire need of foreign exchange to do their business, pay for their medical bills, pay for education and vacations, etc. But the prevailing market price makes it impossible to pursue our dreams…”
Omirhobo complained that the establishment of religious commissions throughout the 36 states of the federation and in Abuja by law passed by the State Houses of Assembly was discriminatory to other Nigerian citizens that are not of the Islamic and Christian faiths.
According to him, one of the respondent states is currently devastated by the Boko Haram terror conflict, with many internally displaced persons who are in dire need of food and other basic needs.
“The monies given to the pilgrims by the state governors is a waste of tax payers monies,” he said, which according to him would be better spent, along with donations made by the international community and other concerned persons, “to internally displaced persons in that state.”
Respondents in the suit filed at Federal High Court sitting at Ikoyi are the Federal Government, the Attorney General of the Federation, the 36 states of the federation and their attorneys general, the Central Bank of Nigeria, the National Christian Pilgrim Commission, the National Hajj Commission, Muslim Pilgrims Welfare Board and the Christian Pilgrims Welfare board in the 36 states.

Tuesday, 1 December 2015

Feminism in Amma Darko’s ‘Faceless’




Feminism is the ideology and belief that men and women should have equal rights and opportunities. Reading Amma Darko’s ‘Faceless,’ we are presented with the malaises in the African society and the problem an African woman faces, of which abuse and negligence are primary focal points. We cannot deny the fact that African culture gives little value to women regardless that they contribute more in building a home. Darko addresses this problem from a rather tragic perspective – perhaps in a message that there is nothing more tragic than treating a woman like she’s not actively important.
Living in a society where women are used as pawns and little regard given to, Dina divorces her husband and starts an NGO organization, MUTE, where she addresses society’s troubling issues more critically. Darko presents a situation where only women work in this organization which supports the claim that women can do as well as men in any position.
On the other hand, Kabria shares the same independent view as her friend and boss, Dina. She is married with three children, but often, she disagrees with her husband’s point of view. Darko shows that both educated and uneducated African men are not different in issues of marriage. Her husband still holds the view that he is not supposed to do any other work in the house so long as he has a job and provides for the family. Kabria, however, does not agree with this. She too has a job which she combines with house chores, taking care of the children and always running off from work to pick them from school. Meanwhile, her husband, who expects his meal to be ready as soon as he comes back, doesn’t see her as a busy woman. Let’s react to this:

“Adede’s car horn sounded at the gate about an hour after Kabria and the children had all eaten and bathed and were settled behind the television. She managed a smile for him at the door after Abena had opened the gate for him. But inside, she fumed as she reflected upon all that long and easy talk about how if a woman wanted to keep her marriage always fresh and her husband all to herself, she had better make him feel good at home. ‘Welcome him home with a smile,’ they say, ‘look good for him. Wear a mini skirt for him if he loves seeing you in one. Pamper him. Do him this. Do him that. Gosh! Who pampered her when she returned home tired from work, only to go and continue in the kitchen… who met her with a smile? Who wore Levi’s jeans and an open neck polo shirt, which she loved so much on, for?” (57)

The problem we have in this except is that women are taught how to keep their men at all cost, whereas men are not taught the same. Here, Adede represents the majority of African men who see women just as housewives and a man’s tool for sexual satisfaction. These men don’t bother themselves with other things that make a woman happy so long as they have a job that puts food on her table. We can also argue that such men know a lot about the engine of their cars than they know about their wife’s feelings, what they really need, and what makes them tick. Kabria knows what she must do to make her husband happy and keep her family together, but Adede believes every other thing is settled on his path providing he pays the family bills. Most of the efforts that are needed to keep the family together are expected from the women while the men only give orders and when they are bored with events at home, they go out to spend time with friends, but it becomes a problem if the reverse serves the case.
On another instance, unlike Kabria, Maa Tsuru is an uneducated character that represents a timid and illiterate African woman who has no knowledge of what she is doing or what she’s supposed to do. Though her plight is nobody’s fault but Darko presents a sad situation of how a woman without standard; a women of total conformity is treated in the society. Maa Tsuru, like most African women, holds the view that her only role as a woman is to have children and so she does not see herself as more valuable in other things. Her ignorance and vulnerability makes her become a sex tool to men. In her time, she has met a lot of men who take advantage of her and walk away. Darko shows a circumstance where things always go wrong for most women as soon as a man comes into their lives. Maa Tsuru has five children without a husband. Her first four children are with a man who comes back severally as her husband and runs away at the birth of each child. The children all fend for themselves on the street and the first two girls, at fifteen and fourteen, are already sexually exposed. In fact, a neighbour who has two children with two separated women takes advantage of this and rapes one of the underage girls.
 We are introduced to a kind of Sodom-and-Gomorrah Street life where both boys and girls are living in but it is the boys who are in control. The boys are comfortable because they live like kings in the street and use the girls’ plights to their own advantage. This act demonstrates that the society has no pity for defenseless women.
The image of feminine gender in Faceless depicts the evil in treating women as second-rates. We are exposed to the situation where the woman tries harder than the man to keep the family together; a society where vulnerable and susceptible women become tools of sport for men, even when they are still underage and need protection.
More so, ‘Faceless’ reminds us of a society in which there is no joy for a mother who has no male child.